Web Design Agency

UX Case Study

Udemy.com Design Audit

Your site performs at an Excellent level. You are particularly strong in Fluency, while improvements are suggested in Interaction.

84

Overall Score

Estetik100

UX/IX50

Kararlılık92

İçerik88

Teknik95

Akış100

Marka60

Motion45

Chromatic Aesthetics & Vitality

Score: 100

Colorfulness is measured at 0.00. This indicates an achromatic/minimal palette strategy rather than vivid color expression. In this audited run, WCAG contrast checks reported 0 detected issues.

Analysis by Celal Dinç

Colorfulness (M)

0.00

Low vitality (monotonous/minimalist).

Contrast Issues (WCAG)

0 Detected Issues

Spatial Balance & Symmetry

Score: 92

Visual balance is reported at %0.2 in this sample, indicating asymmetry in center-of-mass distribution. However, grid adherence and border-radius consistency are both %100, showing strict spatial system discipline.

Analysis by Celal Dinç

Visual Balance

%0.2

Right/left visual weight distribution.

Compositional Clutter

0.92

Very low clutter density.

Grid Adherence

%100

4px grid alignment consistency.

Border-Radius Consistency

%100

Corner radius consistency.

Typographic Science

Score: 88

Detected type scale is 1.250 (Major Third), with average line-height at 1.42. Font profile resolves to system-oriented families (system-ui, monospace, sans fallback).

Analysis by Celal Dinç

Detected Scale

1.250

Golden / Minor Third / Major Third references.

Avg Line Height

1.42

Font Type

system-uimonospaceSans

Interaction Physics & Gestalt

Score: 50

Fitts compatibility is 0/100 in this snapshot, with average target size around 18px. This is below mobile ergonomics recommendations. Gestalt consistency is 100/100, indicating very consistent CTA/button styling.

Analysis by Celal Dinç

Fitts Compatibility

0 / 100

Target size: 18px (avg).

Gestalt Consistency

100 / 100

Style variation: 0 different styles.

Interactive Elements

Content Intelligence & Sustainability

Score: 88

Readability IQ is 7.4 with low text density. Snapshot captured 37 words and a high text/image ratio value (37.0) due to minimal content state. Semantic DNA scores 100. Sustainability metrics are strong: 0.12 MB page weight and ~0.07g CO2 per visit.

Analysis by Celal Dinç

Readability IQ

7.4

Simple / low-density language pattern.

Word Count

Text / Image Ratio

37.0

Semantic DNA

SCORE: 100

Green UX

100 / 100

Green UX score.

Page Weight

0.12 MB

Carbon Footprint

99.1

0.07g

Carbon0.07g

Visual Attention & Inclusivity

Score: 92

Attention prediction prioritizes structural containers (HTML/BODY/DIV). Visual hierarchy adherence is marked as improvable. Deuteranopia simulation indicates colors remain distinguishable in this run.

Analysis by Celal Dinç

Artificial Attention Prediction

HTML (Heading Area)

100

BODY (Body)

100

DIV (Container)

Visual Hierarchy Adherence

Should Be Improved

Focus hierarchy can be refined.

Color Blind Simulation

Distinctiveness preserved

Technology and Design Infrastructure

Score: 95

Framework fingerprint reports Angular in the scanned run. Infrastructure profile indicates custom high-performance code patterns. Tech modernity is strong (85) with ~80% custom code ratio.

Analysis by Celal Dinç

Detected Frameworks

AngularCustom High-Performance Code

Tech Modernity Score

Maintenance: Standardized

Custom: ~80%

Brand Intelligence & Motion Physics

Score: 45

Brand archetype is estimated as The Sage, with an achromatic palette emphasizing neutrality and timelessness. Motion profile is effectively static in this sample: 0ms average duration, low smoothness score (45), and no counted animation sequences.

Analysis by Celal Dinç

Brand Archetype

The Sage

#Wise#Minimal#Neutral#Modern

"An achromatic palette representing simplicity, wisdom and timelessness."

Motion Physics

0ms

Smoothness

Robotic (Linear) / Static

Animation Count

Scientific Foundations

Fuzzy User-driven Color Harmony

arXiv•Lai et al. (2023)

User-driven fuzzy modeling for color harmony estimation.

Objective Design Factors & Aesthetics

ScienceDirect•Seckler et al. (2015)

Objective design factors and their relationship with perceived aesthetics.

Visual Complexity & Perception

SIGDOC•Michailidou et al. (SIGDOC)

How visual complexity impacts user perception.

Self-Developed Aesthetics Measure

arXiv•Zheng et al. (2011)

Aesthetic measurement framework for computational interfaces.

Digital Video Colourmaps for Dichromats

Color Research•Viénot, Brettel & Mollon (1999)

Color conversion approaches for dichromat vision simulation.

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1

W3C Recommendation•W3C (2018)

Accessibility and contrast rules for web interfaces.

This review content is written as an evaluation based on data produced after analysis by our Design Audit Tool (/tools/design-audit). The metrics in this review are generated objectively by our tool. Interpretive commentary on top of those objective metrics may include personal opinion.